The Supreme Court has recently updated the No-Fault Arbitration Rules (available at www.courts.state.mn.us/cio/public_notices.htm). Here are the main changes:
There was a timing problem with the adoption of the Rules, which occurred by order dated August 5, 2003. Unfortunately, the draft of the rules took unusually long to be adopted, and specified that the new qualifications were effective August 1, 2003, four days earlier. The status of already-appointed arbitrators who no longer qualified was thrown into doubt? The Supreme Court again amended the rules September 10, 2003, changing the effective date for the Rule 10 changes to January 1, 2004.
Query: What was the status of arbitrators who no longer qualified between August 5 and September 10?
Not sure whether you have the necessary qualifications? MAJ has scheduled an excellent 3-credit seminar; “Wanna Stay a No-Fault Arbitrator?” November 7. Call Sandy at MAJ (612-375-1707, 1-800-898-6852) to register.
Rule 42. Expenses
Generally each side should pay its own expenses. An arbitrator does, however, have the discretion to direct a party or parties to pay expenses as part of an award.
Under the old rule, the appellate courts did not allow arbitrators to award expert witness fees, Kerber v. Allied Group Ins., 516 N.W.2d 568 (Minn. App. 1994). In Kerber, the court relied on the old language which specifically provided that parties pay for their own witnesses. Thus witness fees are again taxable at the arbitrator’s discretion.
The MAJ e-mail list servers get frequent mention in this column because of the wealth of ideas and information exchanged. MAJ has recently brought the list server in-house, at http://mntla.org/ (Note –no “www” –Check your old messages or call Derek for your password). Members can view every message posted on the lists since their inception in January 2000. The archives include legal advice, mediator and arbitrator recommendations, referral; attorney, jury instructions. You can do full text searches, and the messages can be sorted by name, subject, and chronologically.
uList serve members often exchange suggestions regarding arbitrators and strike lists, but MAJ member Matt Brenengen suggested another information source: www.google.com. Just typing in the arbitrator’s name and Minnesota will usually bring up lots of information about the candidate. He also suggested a Westlaw search would turn up any appeals the lawyer had handled, which would be helpful in analyzing their potential as an arbitrator.
Remember, MAJ keeps Report cards of arbitrators. Call MAJ to see if a fellow member has given a passing grade on your potential arbitrators.
Q. When is a car not a motor vehicle? A. When it’s painted black and white! The Supreme Court has held that marked police cars are not motor vehicles. Strange as that may seem, it does follow the dictates of the statute. The No-Fault Act uses Motor vehicle licensing as the trigger for coverage. Since a marked police car does not need to be licensed, it is not considered a motor vehicle for purposes of the act.
The ramifications of Mutual Service Casualty Ins. Co. v. League of Minnesota Cities Ins. Trust, __ N.W.2d __ (Minn. Case No. CX-01-1929, filed April 24, 2003)are many, and not all negative.
Many medical providers and their copying services attempt to charge a retrieval fee when no medical records are found. Lawyers receive numerous bills for $13.58 ($14.46 with tax) from providers who insist they have the right to charge that under Minn Stat. §144.335. However, the statutory language clearly requires that the charges don’t kick in until copies of medical records are actually made:
(b) When a provider or its representative makes copies of patient records upon a patient's request under this section, the provider or its representative may charge the patient or the patient's representative . . . Minn. Stat. §144.335 Subd. 5(b), (2002)(emphasis added).
Some lawyers argue that an injured plaintiff is always requesting their records for that purpose, and should not be charged. Medical providers take the position that the plaintiff must make the request in person (although there is no such language in the statute) and that puts practical obstacles in the way of lawyers attempting to save their clients the charges.
Social Security Exception. However, few lawyers are aware that the provider must specifically provide the lawyer free copies (plus two free updates) when appealing a denial of Social Security Disability Benefits. Minn. Stat. §144.335 Subd. 5(d), (2002).
VanLangen v. Western National Ins. Group, (Minn Ct. App. unpub’d No. C9-02-149 filed 7-23-02). Last year, in what should have been a published case, MAJ member Dr. David Ketroser won an important no-fault decision covering burden of proof, lapse, and massage therapy.
VanLangen stopped seeing her neurologist, but continue to have symptoms from the accident. She secured massage therapy for the following three years without a referral or supervision by a doctor. She then found out the treatment might be compensable under the no-fault act, and secured a referral slip after the fact . Western argued that this amounted to a lapse in treatment. The arbitrator awarded the benefits, the district court reversed the award, and the Court of Appeals reinstated the arbitrator’s award. Some points to cite:
In addition, the case implicitly approves massage therapy.
Occasionally, no-fault insurers assert a low mileage rate for reimbursement of transportation expenses. MAJ member Matthew Thornton complained of one insurer asserting an alleged IRS rate of 12 cents per mile for medical mileage reimbursement.
MAJ past president Duane Lillehaug noted that the rate quoted was for charitable deductions where mileage isn't reimbursed by the charity. Current MAJ president Peter W. Riley suggested asking the insurer two simple questions: At what rate do they reimburse the adjusters and the executives of the company, and would they rather the client take a cab?
Keep in mind that the statute provides for “reasonable transportation costs.” Minn. Stat. § 65B.44, subd. 2 (2002). The IRS medical and charitable rate is not intended in any way to resemble the actual or reasonable costs… they are reduced rates to provide some minimal deductibility, similar to the medical deduction itself, where your first huge chunk of medicals (7.5% of your Adjusted Gross Income)are not deductible.
Type “mileage reimbursement rate” into Google and you’ll get a huge list of 36-cent-per-mile websites…
and mail the insurer a sheaf of authority….
Don’t forget that if you’ve got other “reasonable expenses,” they are compensable and should be submitted to the insurer. For certain clients, the cost of a taxi or a bus cards is the most reasonable expense.
Are you and all the members of your firm MAJ members? If you’re not, you should be. Any lawyer handling litigation, primarily for plaintiffs, should have their own membership. The basic MAJ membership provides you with access to a wide range of professional support services designed to assist and advance your skills as a trial lawyer.
Only MAJ members (and not their office-mates) are able to participate in:
Why wait for a stale magazine with a 3-month old routing slip from your MAJ Member partner or superior? For only $25 per month (if you’ve been a lawyer more than five years), MAJ members can participate fully and receive the bi-monthly and quarterly Membership Communications: MAJ News - Minnesota Case Reports - Minnesota Trial Lawyer Magazine - MAJ Update.
Upgraded Membership. If you’re already an MAJ regular member, Good for You! You should consider the benefits of an upgraded membership.
For only $150 more, a SILVER membership provides:
A GOLD member gets ten Free CLE Credits, two free MAJ Publications, 200 pages from the Information Bank and 500 Client Counseling Brochures.
For less than $100 per month, a PLATINUM member receives: